🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, after a divisive law change that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Communities often devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to establish different wards – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their seats.